Door squeaks as PM peeks
Andrew Bolt
October 08, 2008 12:00am
EVEN on the day it was announced, the Rudd Government's plan to import a million extra people in just three years seemed stupid.
Now, as stock markets melt and shares shrivel, it's positively dangerous.
Question: Why is the Government running the biggest immigration program in our history just as the economy may be careening into a wall?
Why does it plan in its first term to import the equivalent of the population of Adelaide when even Prime Minister Kevin Rudd concedes unemployment is about to climb?
Oh, sorry - you didn't know Rudd had so ramped up immigration?
Don't blame yourself. He never mentioned in his campaign launch last year that he had any such intention.
*snip*
Fact is, almost all the other policies of the federal and state governments leave us totally unprepared to deal with an intake that huge.
For a start, most states have got out of the habit of laying on the essential infrastructure we need for ourselves, let alone for migrants as well.
These are now green times, so they hate building dams. They despise building power stations. They shy at building city freeways. They resent releasing farmland for houses. They even want less irrigation of crops, and not more.
Result? They can't even give those here already enough water. They can't unclog our roads or unjam our trains. They can't make new houses affordable or food cheaper, and soon they'll struggle even to generate enough electricity.
So how are they going to offer land, water, power and transport to more than 500,000 permanent newcomers Rudd hopes to settle here permanently in just three years?
No wonder Premier John Brumby two months ago cried enough on immigration: "I think we are probably at the limits of growth."
Sure, eager-to-please Rudd thought turbo-charging the intake of migrants and temporary workers would please big business.
After all, importing workers thrills companies that want to keep down wages. Importing migrants puts a glint in the eye of house builders and car makers salivating to sell the new arrivals homes and wheels.
But, as the Productivity Commission warned just two years ago, for the rest of us immigration just means more competition and not much gain.
Even with a modest rise in immigration of some 40,000 skilled workers each year, the commission said in Economic Impacts of Migration and Population Growth, "the impact of migration is very small compared with other drivers of per capita income growth".
Britain's House of Lords Select Committee on Economic Affairs this year found the same was true there: "Our general conclusion is that the economic benefits of positive net immigration are small or insignificant."
In fact, thanks to the Rudd Government's manic belief in man-made global warming, a lot of migrants could actually make us a lot worse off.
That's because every new migrant, with his eating, burping, driving, computering and light-switching, adds to the greenhouse gases we pump out - just when the Government is determined to bring an emissions trading scheme in 2010 to make us cut those gases. Or pay.
That means the more migrants we bring in, the more the rest of us will have to cut our own emissions to make up for them and meet the cap the Government eventually sets. So importing migrants is importing carbon pain.
And remember: all this was clear even before our economy started to slide. How much dumber does it seem now to amp up immigration when we could be on the brink of mass lay-offs?
Even Rudd last week conceded: "The global financial crisis is having a greater impact on economies around the world, including in Australia, and that will mean unemployment in Australia could now increase more than forecast earlier in the year."
So the plan is to bring in even more migrants to compete for jobs with Australians who are now losing their own? I don't think so.
But I said Rudd's plan was not just dumb but now dangerous.
Here's why. We may hate to admit it, but we today struggle to assimilate some groups of migrants as well as we once did -- especially those with poor skills and worse English. In NSW, for instance, Lebanese-born citizens are twice more likely as the rest of us to be jailed. In Melbourne, police battle ethnic gangs of African refugees.
So it's important that future immigrants have the background and the skills to fit in, and especially the education they need to land good jobs and make their own way.
But the Rudd Government, crazily enough, has skewed its immigration policies to allow in more poorly skilled immigrants who may not even speak English.
Full article
1 comment:
Strange how Andrew Bolt made no comment on the high Immigration rate under Howard. But that comes with the territory as a partisan yes-man.
Post a Comment